RefBan

Referral Banners

Yashi

Thursday, December 13, 2012

The Most Important Laptops of 2012

December 13th, 2012Top Story

The Most Important Laptops of 2012

By Gizmodo

The Most Important Laptops of 20122012 was a big year for laptops. Windows 8 came along with its touch-centric worldview, Intel kept plugging away on its ultrabook crusade, and Apple finally started pumping out Retina MacBooks. Here's our list of the most important machines of the year.


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

10. Acer Aspire S7 11-inch

This is a statement of intent from Acer, and really all Windows laptops. Along with Samsung's Series 9, this is the most impressively designed and built laptop we've seen. Apple included. It's just wonderful, with a gorgeous, bright capacitive touch 1080p display crammed onto its 11-inch body. Acer has a few kinks to work out, like that undersized trackpad, before this really takes off, but it was the arrival of a new big time player in laptops, and a reaffirmation that Windows can be beautiful.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

9. Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13

Lenovo was the first Windows 8 hybrid out the gate at CES this year, and its 13-inch Yoga managed to stay ahead of the field and come in as the best touchscreen convertible we saw this year. That makes it the unofficial face of Windows 8 laptops, even if Surface RT is the hardware face of Windows 8 itself. [More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

8. Asus Zenbook Prime UX31A

Asus's Zenbooks have been some of the most popular ultrabooks out, but this year's UX31A was notable for its gorgeous 1080p screen, which outshines anything short of a Retina display from Apple. The Zenbooks still have keyboard and trackpad issues to deal with, but pushing great displays on nice laptops at affordable prices is pretty important.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

7. Samsung Series 9

Samsung's Series 9 was already really good last year—it was our favorite ultrabook at the time—but its total redesign this year cemented it as the most gorgeous laptop you can own. Period. We didn't love what that did to the keyboard, but wrestling "best looking laptop" away from Apple is a big deal, especially when it does't look like Cupertino's going to take it back any time soon.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

6. Dell XPS 12

Early this year, ultrabooks were still getting off the groups, taking their first awkward, unsure steps toward being good and viable. Dell's XPS 12 was one of the first to really get almost everything right while also embracing a lot of Intel's features, which early ultrabooks avoided. It came in between the first and second waves of ultrabooks, and set a template for build quality and usability.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

5. Vizio Thin + Light

The Vizio Thin + Light looked like it had a chance to be something special when we saw it at CES, and it didn't quite live up to that. But it's still the first laptop out of bootstraps-up TV-maker Vizio, and it showed enough promise that we're excited to see if it can improve on things next year.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

4. Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon

The ThinkPad X1 Carbon is ostensibly a business machine, but it sure don't look like one. It's sleek—even sleeker than the original X1—and performs as well as any ultrabook in its class. But the importance comes from the convergence of enterprise ruggedness and consumer-grade design. We want splash-proof, drop-proof, life-proof gadgets, and the X1 Carbon was a big step toward that happening. [More]


<img src="The Most Important Laptops of 2012

3. Acer Chromebook

Chromebooks aren't for everyone, but they're excellent little internet machines, and just about all a lot of people need out of a computer. And a $200 price tag is a big deal for a machine that actually works (and won't make everyone who touches it want jump off of a building).
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

2. Razer Blade

The new Razer Blade looks basically identical to the first Blade, which was released this spring. But the new model has all new guts—including a bump up to a GeForce GTX 660M—that are finally good enough to make Razer's attempted defragmentation of the PC gaming market a possibility. The price still has to come down, but Razer's doing important stuff.
[More]


The Most Important Laptops of 2012

1. MacBook Pro with Retina

The Retina MacBook Pro was probably inevitable, but that doesn't stop it from being important. It was the first ultra-high resolution laptop display, and unlike the extravagantly expensive 13-inch version, it actually performed up to its price tag.
[More]


Number of comments

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping Choices

December 13th, 2012Top Story

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping Choices

By Thorin Klosowski

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesEver come home from a day of shopping and wondered why on earth you purchased certain items? As it turns out, our brains corrupt our shopping choices to the point that we barely know what we're doing. Here's what's happening and what you can do about it.

We've talked about the stupid things you do when shopping before, but those are just part of the problem. The other big issue? You have cognitive biases that sabotage your decisions, cause you to waste money, and buy things you ay not even really want. Let's dig into a few of the worst ways your brain corrupts your choices when when you're shopping.

Confirmation Bias Causes You to Waste Money on Things You Don't Need

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesConfirmation bias is one of the worst biases we have. You believe your opinion is based on years of objective analysis, right? In reality, your opinion is nothing more than the a collection of information you choose to pay attention to. Confirmation bias is when you only believe information that conforms to your prior belief and you discount everything else. It's the reason hard-lined Republicans watch Fox News and hard-lined Democrats watch MSNBC. Confirmation bias colors your decisions in everything ranging from politics to science, but it's just as impactful on your shopping choices. As financial blog The Simple Dollar points out, confirmation bias is used by advertisers all the time to affect your decisions:

Let's say you've seen repeated advertisements and product placements that convince you that a particular product is really cool. You go into a store, see it on a well-designed display, and find yourself really wanting this item you don't need. You sigh, decide that you can probably afford it, and head to the checkout aisle.

It's not just gadgets that trick your confirmation bias, it's pretty much everything. Take the common cold as an example. As we've talked about before, most "alternative" treatments for a cold, like Vitimin C and zinc, aren't as well proven as basic home remedies. People still believe they work so strongly because they've been told as much for most of their lives. You end up wasting money on something with no proven benefit because you're unwilling to believe evidence to the contrary.

With shopping especially, confirmation bias also causes you to narrow your research to positive results that conform to your previous opinion. The main way to counter this is to keep an open mind, research through a variety of sources, and if the data tells you you're wrong, accept it and find another product.

The Decoy Effect Confuses You Into Thinking You're Getting a Deal

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesThe decoy effect is one of the toughest biases to see because it's essentially a marketing trick. Basically, it's when we change our preference for a product when an expensive product is right next to it. In his book Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, author Dan Ariely shares this example:

When Williams-Sonoma first introduced a home "bread bakery" machine (for $275), most consumers were not interested...Flustered by the poor sales, the manufacturer of the bread machine brought in a marketing research firm, which suggested a fix: introduce an additional model of the bread maker, one that was not only larger but priced 50 percent higher than the initial machine...Sales began to rise, though it was not the large bread maker that was being sold...people didn't have to make their decision in a vacuum. They could say: "Well, I don't know much about bread makers, but I do know that if I were to buy one, I'd rather have the smaller one for less money."

Here's another way to put it using this years supposed hottest gift: the tablet. You might have no interest in a tablet at all, but when you have the iPad priced at $499 and the smaller Kindle Fire at $159 right next to each other, you're going to buy the cheaper, smaller one. You might even say to yourself, "Well, I don't know much about tablets, but I do know that if I were to buy one, I'd rather have the smaller one for less money."

In most cases, a little bit of research on a product can counteract the decoy effect. It's also important to ask yourself if you're purchasing something you actually want, or if you're just buying it because you think you should. Photo by Intel Free Press.

Hyperbolic Discounting Makes You Buy Items Right Now Because You Can't Wait

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesHyperbolic Discounting is a biases that we've probably all fallen for, knowing full well we were falling for it. Essentially, hyperbolic discounting is when you prefer an option that arrives sooner rather than later.

So, lets say you're standing in a store and you see that a piece of software you want is 25% off. You know for a fact you can order it from Amazon for 50% off, but you don't want to wait. You want the software right now, so you buy it from the store at the higher price instead of Amazon.

Fortunately, this is one of the biases you can really fight against. If you start comparing prices before you're actually in a store (although these mobile apps can help you in the store as well), you have a better chance of putting everything on the same delivery timeline. Two day shipping from Amazon to save 50% sounds pretty good when you're sitting at your computer and thinking about the commute to the store. If you know the variation on prices beforehand, you're more likely to not worry about getting it immediately. Photo by Roger Price.

Restraint Bias Makes You Believe You Actually Have Control Over Impulse Purchases

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesRestraint bias is when you overestimate your ability to control impulsive behavior. You believe you can control your impulses all the time when in fact you're pretty horrible at it. On its own restraint bias is just an annoying quirk of your brain, but when it's coupled with shopping (or any addiction) it means you're more likely to buy things on a whim than you think you are.

As science writer Ed Yong points out, the more control you think have over your impulses, the more likely it is you'll lose control.

So, let's say you walk into an Apple store, because you want to "just check out" a new iPad. You believe that you have the restraint to not actually buy one, but when you get there and start playing with it you convince yourself to buy it on an impulse. You tell yourself you'll do it "just this once." Later that day, you head to the grocery store and in the checkout lane you start flipping through People Magazine. You decide to buy it "just this once" because you never succumb to your impulses. And so on, and so on.

The easiest way to fight against restraint bias is to simply not put yourself in situations where you're challenging your self-control. While you can boost your self-control with practice, it's best to not believe you're in control in the first place and stay away from those situations. Photo by Gord Webster.

Anchoring Makes You Believe the Worth of All Items Based on the First

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesAnchoring is a bias where you rely on the first piece of information you see to set the standard for all the information that follows. For example, if you see that Apple sells their iPad for $499 then you believe that's a fair price for all tablets. In fact, we usually have no idea what a product is worth, and the first company that throws out a number sets the standard for everything else.

Unfortunately, that's not all. That anchor works across different products as well. The Atlantic shares one story about how a store can adjust your anchor:

You walk into a high-end store, let's say it's Hermès, and you see a $7,000 bag. "Haha, that's so stupid!" you tell your friend. "Seven grand for a bag!" Then you spot an awesome watch for $367. Compared to a Timex, that's wildly over-expensive. But compared to the $7,000 price tag you just put to memory, it's a steal. In this way, stores can massage or "anchor" your expectations for spending.

Anchoring works in pretty much any type of shopping experience, from the housing market to groceries stores where everything is always "discounted" from an manufacturer's suggested price. The worst part? Anchoring is really hard to avoid even when you know you're doing it. Like most of these biases, the best thing you can do is acknowledge it exists and challenge your thought process as often as possible. Photo by Jason Meredith.

Choice-Supportive Bias Causes You to Make Stupid Decisions Based on Nostalgia

How Your Brain Corrupts Your Shopping ChoicesChoice-supportive bias is when you only remember the positive attributes of a choice you made in the past. It's part of the explanation behind brand loyalty, and whether you realize it or not, it colors every future decision you make in a bad way.

So, let's say you've worn Converse since childhood, and you continue to purchase them despite the fact they don't seem to last as long as they used to. Your nostalgia for that original purchase, combined with how your memory is blinded by choice-supportive bias causes you to keep buying those same shoes even though you're consistently disappointed with them because you only remember the positive qualities.

The only real way to fight this is to get yourself out of the rut of purchasing the same products, try out different brands, and research other options. Photo by Jacob Bøtter.


The most interesting thing about our biases is the fact they all work together to sabotage our basic thinking and decision-making skills. The worst part is that collectively, we all believe we don't have these biases to begin with. In this case, it's best to simply recognize you have these biases, and keep them in mind when you're out shopping.

Title images by CLIPAREA (Shutterstock) and Mushakesa (Shutterstock).

Click to view Number of comments

Slatest PM: Susan Rice's Loss Is John Kerry's Gain

Trouble viewing this email? View these recent stories in your browser.
 
header
Thursday, December 13, 2012

Your daily PM briefing from The Slatest (@slatest), your trusty news companion.

By Josh Voorhees (@JoshVoorhees)

Point, John McCain: Susan Rice announced today that she has taken her name off the short list to be the next secretary of state. The embattled diplomat went public with her decision in an interview with NBC News this afternoon after informing President Obama of her decision by letter. The move represents a surprising end to Rice's time as the apparent front-runner to replace Secretary Hillary Clinton as head of the State Department when the former first lady steps down from her post. McCain and his fellow Senate Republicans had steadfastly vowed to do all they could to block Rice's confirmation, but there had been little to suggest that Obama would allow the GOP threats to force his hand, and the president had repeatedly voiced his unwavering support for Rice.

The Letter: "If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly—to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities," Rice told Obama. "That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country ... Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time."

White House Reaction: "While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character, and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment to put our national interests first," Obama said in a statement. "The American people can be proud to have a public servant of her caliber and character representing our country."

GOP Reaction: "I respect Ambassador Rice’s decision. President Obama has many talented people to choose from to serve as our next Secretary of State," Sen. Lindsey Graham said in a statement, adding: "When it comes to Benghazi I am determined to find out what happened—before, during, and after the attack. Unfortunately, the White House and other agencies are stonewalling when it comes to providing the relevant information. I find this unacceptable."

The Real Winners: Sen. John Kerry, and maybe Scott Brown. With Rice out of the picture, it would appear to greatly increase the chances that Kerry lands his dream job. The Massachusetts Democrat has long had his sights on leading the State Department. (He's also been rumored to be in the running for Defense secretary, but former GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel has emerged as the new front-runner for that post.) If Obama does tap Kerry for a cabinet position, however, that would leave the door open for Brown to find his way back to the Senate by winning his second special election.

Happy Thursday, welcome to The Slatest PM. Follow your afternoon host on Twitter at @JoshVoorhees and the whole team at @slatest.

More on Hagel and the DOD: Bloomberg: "Former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel has emerged as the leading candidate to become Obama’s next Secretary of Defense and may be nominated as soon as this month, according to two people familiar with the matter. Hagel, who served as an enlisted Army infantryman in Vietnam, has passed the vetting process at the White House Counsel’s office, said one of the people. The former Nebraska senator has told associates that he is awaiting final word from the president, said the other person. Both requested anonymity to discuss personnel matters."

Speaking of Panetta: Washington Post: An American service member was killed and three were wounded Thursday afternoon when a suicide bomber rammed a car packed with explosives into a heavily armored military vehicle just outside a base where U.S. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta had been visiting troops earlier in the day. The attack outside Kandahar Air Field, a heavily-guarded base in Kandahar province, underscored the tenuous security in the country’s south, the Taliban’s heartland, as the U.S. military footprint continues to thin out. Two Afghan civilians were killed and several were wounded in the blast, local officials said."

Russia Comes to Grips With an Assad-Less Future: New York Times: "Russia’s top Middle East diplomat and the leader of NATO offered dark and strikingly similar assessments of the embattled Syrian president’s future on Thursday, asserting that he was losing control of the country after a nearly two-year conflict that has taken 40,000 lives and has threatened to destabilize the Middle East. The bleak appraisals—particularly from Russia, a steadfast strategic Syrian ally—amounted to a new level of pressure on the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, who has been resorting to increasingly desperate military measures, including the use of Scud ballistic missiles, to contain an armed insurgency that has encroached on the capital, Damascus."

McAfee's Back in the United States: Associated Press: "Anti-virus software founder John McAfee said Thursday that U.S. authorities have made no efforts to question him since he arrived in Miami after weeks of evading Belizean authorities who want to ask him about the death of his neighbor. 'Why would they want to question me, about what?' a tired-looking but sharply dressed McAfee said Thursday from the steps of his South Beach hotel. ... McAfee was deported from Guatemala after sneaking in illegally from Belize, where police want to question him in connection with the death of a U.S. expatriate who lived near him on an island off Belize's coast. U.S officials said there was no active arrest warrant for McAfee that would justify taking him into custody."

TV Commercials Just Got a Whole Lot Quieter: Los Angeles Times: "No need to dive for the mute button today: A new federal law aimed at lowering the volume of TV commercials goes into effect. ... Under the rule, commercials should have the same average volume as the programs they accompany. The Federal Communications Commission, which has called loud TV commercials 'one of the most persistent problems of the television age,' said it will rely on consumer complaints to monitor industry compliance. ... Obama signed the measure nearly two years ago, but it took time for the FCC to draw up rules, and for industry groups to work through the technical issues and come into compliance."

Doomsday Predictions: New PRRI poll: "Only 2% of Americans believe that the end of the world, as predicted by the ancient Mayans, will happen by the end of this year. However, 15% of Americans believe that the end of the world, as predicted by the Book of Revelation, will occur in their lifetime."

More Slate Quick Hits—

See you back here tomorrow. But, until then, tell your friends to subscribe, or simply forward the newsletter on and let them make up their own minds.

BEST FEATURED STORIES
header
Susan Rice Drops Out of Secretary of State Running
header
The Schism About the Nature of Nature That's Tearing Apart the Environmental Movement
header
What Makes a Yacht a Yacht? Its Length? Its Fanciness?
header
Much of What You've Heard About the Oregon Mall Shooting Has Been Debunked
 
Copyright 2012 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy
The Slate Group | c/o E-mail Customer Care | 1350 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 410 | Washington, D.C. 20036

Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend
 

Yashi

Chitika