| ||||||||||||||||||||
(0) Books remaining on Shelf | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
No matter how carefully you plan your goals they will never be more that pipe dreams unless you pursue them with gusto. --- W. Clement Stone
| ||||||||||||||||||||
(0) Books remaining on Shelf | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Manage your newsletters on Slate Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information
Please do not reply to this message since this is an unmonitored e-mail address.
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com.
Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy
The Slate Group | c/o E-mail Customer Care | 1350 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 410 | Washington, D.C. 20036
![]() | |
![]() | |
television Stoner Dog to the Rescue A depressed lawyer befriends an unusual talking canine in the comedy Wilfred. By Troy PattersonPosted Thursday, June 23, 2011, at 10:05 PM ET
In any case, Wilfred is a drug-sniffing dog in the sense that he owns a bong made out of a plastic juice bottle, and Wilfred, the FX series, is a stoner comedy that somehow behaves as if it's goofy on pills. Whereas the original had a homey shaggy charm and a coherent internal logic, the remake is crisper and weirder and queasily dystopian and slightly Apatowized. FX likes comedies with a dark streak, and this one certainly qualifies. It's a fondly nihilistic portrait of the relationship between an effete depressive (Elijah Wood) and the man's-best-friend-next-door. To continue reading, click here. Troy Patterson is Slate's television critic.Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate The Real Reason It's So Hard To Predict Bubbles Cars 2 Just Doesn't Have the Horsepower of the Pixar Greats Phyllis From The Office Reminisces About Her Days as an NFL Cheerleader | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
![]() | |
![]() | |
moneybox The Hindsight Fallacy The real reason it's so hard to predict bubbles. By Duncan WattsPosted Thursday, June 23, 2011, at 12:09 PM ET
No sooner have these concerns been raised, however, than they have been countered by an array of arguments, all of which are variations on the basic claim that this internet boom is unlike the previous one. This debate illustrates one of the central causes of financial bubbles: Although after the fact it seems obvious that prices were irrational and an unhappy end was inevitable, bubbles are neither obvious nor inevitable at the time. To continue reading, click here. Duncan Watts is a principal research scientist at Yahoo Research, and author of Everything is Obvious*: Once You Know The Answer.Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum What did you think of this article? POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES Also In Slate The Real Reason It's So Hard To Predict Bubbles Cars 2 Just Doesn't Have the Horsepower of the Pixar Greats Phyllis From The Office Reminisces About Her Days as an NFL Cheerleader | Advertisement |
Manage your newsletters subscription: Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Advertising Information | |
Ideas on how to make something better? Send an e-mail to slatenewsletter@nl.slate.com. Copyright 2011 The Slate Group | Privacy Policy |
![]() View this email online | Add newsletter@businessinsider.com to your address book ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
| ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please safely unsubscribe.